![]() There are more dramatic examples, but the message is: Java, Flash and (lately) even Javascript can often beat Mathematica when interactivity is required. Compare for yourself which of these demos runs more smoothly and feels more responsive (James implemented a delay for more physical, smooth response, and you can crank up the number of branchings much higher). But it appears to be only a minor adaptation of another online demo that has, since 2010, been one of the all-time favorites at : "Advanced Tree Generator," created by my son James Nöckel in Processing, a Java-based language. I just looked at one of the featured (May 2011) interactive demonstrations at : "TreeBender." It's a nice interactive fractal tree. The main problem can be summarized in one word: speed. This produces a slightly different file that doesn't appear to exhibit the undesirable behavior we observe from Export. Surely this is a bug (please report it to but you can work around the problem by selecting the graphic and choosing File > Save Selection As. That is no wonder since the Mac OSx version is 64bit only just since very few versions of Masc OsX and Mathematica version 12.0 and before only a 32bit version was available for buying. Here are some results running Mathematica 12.3.1 natively on the M1 MacBook Air ( -with-mathematica-v-12-for-up-to-date-comparison-across-different-ma/250736#250736) and M1 MacBook Pro ( -for-new-m1-macbooks/250779#250779).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |